Native Ads vs Display Ads: Which to Test First for DTC

Both put your ad on other people's websites, but they work very differently. Here is how to pick one and how to test both fairly.

Illustration for the Nativize article: Native Ads vs Display Ads: Which to Test First for DTC
On this page
  1. Native ads vs display ads: the quick verdict
  2. Format: what each ad actually looks like
  3. Attention and intent: who sees it and in what mood
  4. Creative: how much you can say
  5. Where the click lands
  6. Targeting and reach
  7. Cost and buying model
  8. Measurement: how to avoid fooling yourself
  9. Disclosure and policy
  10. When to choose each
  11. How to test native and display with a small, equal budget
  12. How Nativize builds native campaigns
  13. Frequently asked questions
  14. The bottom line
  15. Keep reading

Key takeaways

  • Display ads interrupt: a banner in a fixed slot, built to catch the eye. Native ads blend in: a recommended-content unit that leads to an article-style page.
  • Display is strong for retargeting and reminding people who already know you. Native is stronger for explaining a product to someone who has never heard of it.
  • Native gives you room to tell a story, but only if you build a page worth reading. Display gives you a few words and an image.
  • Compare the two on cost per purchase and new customers, never on click-through rate alone.
  • Test with the same budget, product, country and tracking, and set your stop rules before you start.

Native ads vs display ads is a common question for brands that have outgrown Meta and want other places to buy traffic. Both run on third-party websites, so they look similar on a media plan. They behave very differently. A display ad is a banner in a fixed slot, and it has to win attention in a second. A native ad is a headline and thumbnail that sit among the articles around it, and it leads to a page that does the selling. This post compares the two on the criteria that matter for an e-commerce brand, says when to pick each, and gives you a way to test both with a small, equal budget.

Native ads vs display ads: the quick verdict

If you only read one part, read this. The short version is that display is built to be seen and native is built to be read. Which one fits depends on how much explaining your product needs.

Choose native ads if...Your product needs explaining, you want to reach people who have never heard of you, and you are willing to build an advertorial (an ad laid out like an article) for each angle you test. Native suits products with a clear problem, a story, or a comparison to make.
Choose display ads if...People already know your brand or product and you mainly need to remind them, you want to retarget visitors who left without buying, or you have strong static creative and no time to build landing pages. Display suits simple, familiar, impulse-friendly products.
CriterionNative adsDisplay ads
LookMatches the page: headline plus thumbnail in a recommended-content unitBanner or image in a fixed slot that stands apart from the page
Reader mindsetBrowsing for something to readReading something else and not looking for ads
CreativeHeadline, image and a full page behind the clickImage and a few words, so the message has to be tiny
Where the click landsUsually an advertorial, sometimes a product pageUsually a product page or landing page
Strongest useProspecting: finding new customers and explaining the productRetargeting and brand reminders
Main work for youWriting and testing anglesProducing banners in many sizes
Main riskWeak or misleading headlines, thin pagesBanner blindness and low-quality placements
DisclosureAds must be clearly labelled as adsAds are obviously ads by format

Format: what each ad actually looks like

A display ad is an image or animated banner in a standard size, placed in a slot on a website or app. The slot is usually in a sidebar, a header or between paragraphs. It looks like an ad and is designed to.

A native ad takes the look of the page around it. On a news or lifestyle site you will see a grid of small thumbnails with headlines under a label like “Recommended for you” or “Around the web”. Those are native ad units, and the ads in them are mixed in with the publisher's own links. You can read more about the formats in our guide to native advertisement types and in the complete guide to native advertising.

The line is not perfectly clean. Some display systems now assemble flexible ad units from your images and text, and some native networks also serve banner-like units. When you compare, compare the experience of the person seeing the ad: does it look like part of the page, or like a box dropped on it?

If you come from Meta, note that a Meta feed ad is also an in-feed format that follows the look of the feed. But “native ads” as a channel means ad networks such as Taboola and Outbrain, which place ads on publisher sites. Our post on Facebook ads for ecommerce covers the Meta side.

Attention and intent: who sees it and in what mood

A person looking at a banner is usually reading an article, checking a recipe or playing a game. They are not shopping. The ad has to interrupt them, and many people have learned to ignore banner areas without thinking about it.

A person who clicks a native headline has chosen to read something. Their mood is curiosity. That is a better state for a story, a comparison or a “why this works” explanation. It is a worse state for a hard sell, so a native ad that reads like a coupon tends to disappoint.

This is why the two formats suit different jobs. Display works well when the person already has context: they visited your site, they know the brand. Native works well when you need to create the context from nothing.

Creative: how much you can say

Display gives you an image and a handful of words. You can show a product clearly and add one offer or claim. Anything more complicated has to wait for the landing page, and you will likely need several sizes of each banner.

Native gives you a headline, a thumbnail and then a whole page. The headline does the targeting: it picks the reader who cares about that problem, audience or story. That makes the creative job different. Instead of designing one good banner, you write several angles, each a distinct reason to care, and let the headlines compete.

For a made-up example (a made-up product, not a client case): a merino wool sock brand could run one native angle on cold feet in an office, one on blisters on long walks, and one on gift buying. In display, the same brand would more likely run one product banner with a different line of text. The native version tests three different stories. The display version tests three captions.

Where the click lands

Display clicks normally go straight to a product page or a collection page. The visitor has seen a few words and has little context, so a cold visitor often needs more convincing than the product page offers.

Native clicks often go to an advertorial: an advertisement laid out as an article, which builds the case before sending the reader to the product page. Our post on what an advertorial is explains the format, and our advertorial examples show what they look like. The advertorial warms the reader up, so the product page is the second step rather than the first.

The trade-off is effort. An advertorial per angle is more work than a banner set. If you will not build real pages, native will likely underperform, because the headline can only get the click. The page has to do the rest.

How dependent is your brand on Meta?Get your Native Ads Readiness Score and Platform Dependency Score in 2 minutes. It is free.

Take the test

Targeting and reach

Meta buyers are used to interest and lookalike audiences. Neither native nor display works quite like that. In both, you choose from options such as geography, device, placements or site lists, and audience signals that vary by network and by buying route. Check what each platform offers before you plan around it.

In native, the angle does much of the targeting. A headline about back pain filters for readers with back pain far better than any setting. For the placement side of this, see our comparison of contextual vs native advertising.

Display is the more common choice for retargeting: showing ads to people who visited your site or added to cart. Many native networks can retarget too, but it is rarely the reason to choose native.

Cost and buying model

Both formats can be bought by the click (you pay when someone clicks) or by the thousand impressions (CPM, you pay for views). Native networks such as Taboola are commonly bought on clicks, and display is often bought on impressions, though both vary. Do not compare price lists. A cheap click that never buys is expensive, and a pricey click that buys is not.

The only useful comparison is cost per purchase, or cost per new customer, at the same budget and attribution rules. Our post on how much native advertising costs goes into the cost factors, and the Taboola ads guide shows how bidding works on one network.

Measurement: how to avoid fooling yourself

Display is often credited with conversions from people who merely saw the ad (view-through conversions) and later bought. Some of those people would have bought anyway, especially in retargeting. Native clicks are more deliberate, but they are two steps from a sale, so you need to track the advertorial as well as the product page.

  • Use the same attribution window for both channels.
  • Track clicks from the advertorial to the product page, not just clicks on the ad.
  • Look at purchases and new customers, not click-through rate alone.
  • Check your own store data, not only the platform dashboards.

Disclosure and policy

Because native ads look like content, they must be clearly labelled as advertising, both in the unit and on the landing page. Treat that as part of the design. A page that is open about being an ad is also easier to defend if a platform or a reader questions it.

Display ads carry less of this burden, since a banner reads as an ad. They still have to follow the policies of the network that serves them. Whatever you run, read the rules of each platform before you build creative.

When to choose each

Choose native when

  • Your product needs a story, a comparison or proof to convince a cold reader.
  • You want to test several reasons to buy against each other.
  • You are looking for new customers beyond Meta and can build article-style pages.
  • Your Meta results are limited by audience fatigue and you need a different kind of attention.

Choose display when

  • You mainly want to retarget visitors and abandoned carts.
  • Your product is simple and familiar, and a good image does most of the job.
  • You have strong brand recognition and need reminders more than explanations.
  • You cannot yet produce or maintain landing pages.

Many brands end up using both: native to find new customers and display to bring back the ones who left. If you are starting with one, start with the one that matches your biggest gap.

How to test native and display with a small, equal budget

A fair test is harder than it sounds, because the two formats lead to different pages. The goal is to test each channel in its natural form, with the same money, product and rules.

  1. Pick one product, one country and one device mix. Do not test your whole catalogue.
  2. Split a small test budget equally between native and display. Use a sum you can afford to lose, because a small test can still come out flat.
  3. Set up the same purchase tracking on both, with the same attribution window. Test the tracking before you spend.
  4. For native, build two or three angles as separate advertorials, each with a few headlines and thumbnails.
  5. For display, build one banner set per angle, in the common sizes, pointing to the product page.
  6. Launch both at the same time so seasonality and news cycles hit both equally.
  7. Do not edit ads, budgets or bids during the test. Each change resets what you can learn.
  8. Write the stop rule in advance: how many days, how much spend, and the cost per purchase you would count as a pass.
  9. At the end, compare cost per purchase and new customers first, then add-to-cart rate and bounce rate for diagnosis.
  10. Keep the winner, but also look at which angle won. A winning angle can be reused in the other channel.

If both channels are inconclusive, that is also a result. It usually means the budget was too small to produce enough purchases, or the angle is weak. Fix the angle before you raise spend.

How Nativize builds native campaigns

Nativize builds and runs native campaigns for e-commerce brands on networks such as Taboola and Outbrain. This is the process, step by step.

  1. Nativize starts from the product page URL, and the builder reads the product page itself, not a summary of it.
  2. It collects customer reviews from the product page and from review sites. It can also take competitor pages or free-text instructions, such as “mention the 30-day guarantee”.
  3. From the page and the reviews, it pulls out the customer's pain points and the benefits people actually mention, in their own words.
  4. It proposes several marketing angles for the product, normally five or more. Each angle is a distinct reason to care, such as a different problem, audience or story, and each becomes its own advertorial.
  5. For the chosen angle, it writes the advertorial as short sections: a headline, a one-line preview, the body and a closing call to action. The writing style and target reader are set before writing, not guessed.
  6. Headlines are generated in sets and graded, and only the strongest are kept. Each is checked against the character limit of the platform it will run on. Ad copy for Meta is also audited for wording likely to cause policy problems.
  7. The product photo and brand logo are uploaded once per product and reused for every angle, so every advertorial shows the same product. Images are made or chosen per section so the picture supports the paragraph.
  8. The layout is chosen separately from the copy. The two most used are a sidebar layout and a centred layout with a sticky call to action, with brand colours taken from the product page.
  9. Every advertorial carries an “ADVERTORIAL” label bar at the top. Health products also get a health disclaimer, attached only where it applies.
  10. The page is exported as a self-contained page and published on the advertiser's own domain. Tracking tags (Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel, GA4 or the advertiser's own script) are added only at export, so reviewing drafts never fires real tracking.
  11. Before publishing, a person can edit single paragraphs, so a small copy fix does not mean regenerating everything.
  12. Several angles can be built in one batch for the same product, and the finished advertorials are then connected to Taboola campaigns.

Paragraphs stay short and separate, because a block of text on a phone screen is read by nobody. If you would rather hand this over, see how a native advertising agency works.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between native ads and display ads?

Native ads take the look of the page around them, usually a headline and thumbnail in a recommended-content unit, and lead to an article-style page. Display ads are banners in fixed slots that stand apart from the page and usually lead to a product or landing page.

Are native ads better than display ads?

Neither is better in general. Native tends to suit explaining a product to new customers, because it gives you room for a story. Display tends to suit retargeting and reminders. Test both on cost per purchase before deciding.

Is Facebook advertising native or display?

Meta feed ads follow the look of the feed, so they are native to the platform in a loose sense. But “native ads” as a channel usually means ad networks like Taboola and Outbrain, which place ads on publisher websites. Display usually means banners on third-party sites and apps.

Do native ads need to be labelled?

Yes. Because they look like content, they should be clearly marked as advertising, both in the ad unit and on the landing page. Check each network's policy for the exact wording it requires.

Can I run native and display ads together?

Yes, and many brands do. A common split is native to reach new customers and display to retarget people who visited and left. Keep the attribution rules the same so you can see what each channel does.

How much budget do I need to test both?

Use an amount you can afford to lose, split equally between the two. It has to be enough to produce a meaningful number of purchases in each channel, or the result will be noise. If it is not, narrow the test to one product and one country rather than adding budget everywhere.

The bottom line

The choice between native ads and display ads comes down to how much your product needs explaining. If it needs a story, native gives you room to tell it. If people already know you, display is a cheap, quick way to remind them. Do not settle it by opinion. Run both for the same time, at the same budget, with the same tracking, and compare cost per purchase. Then keep the channel and the angle that earn their place. If you want to go deeper on the native side, start with our Taboola ads guide and the comparison of Taboola vs Outbrain.

Keep reading

YB

Yash Bhandari

Founder of Nativize.

See if your brand is ready for native ads

Answer 10 quick questions. If you are a fit, you can book a strategy session with a Nativize media buyer.

See if you qualify
Scaling past Meta?Take the test